Hoping for the Best December Ever
Topic: Daily Eruptions
December is typically the month I wish I were single. Every year, Hans gets uspet about something that completely blindsides me and makes me crazy. I try to rotate the distress calls I make following the event and ensuing argument among my various friends and family so it's not the same person having to hear year after year about the monster I live with.

This year, however, Hans and I might be breaking the cycle. We started marriage counseling yesterday. I was very nervous going in because I wasn't sure what Hans was going to say. He doesn't "believe in" therapy and is only going because I made the appointment and gave him an ultimatum. But to his credit, he is going. And, to my amazement, he totally came through for me yesterday. He wasn't the least bit resistant to the process and really tried to answer the counselor's questions. Most surprising, he had some really wonderful things to say about me and about why we make such a great couple, because there are times when we truly are a great couple. At this point, on the commitment scale the counselor gave us, Hans came out significantly more committed to us staying married than I did, (which might increase my own commitment) and he is completely committed to our continuing therapy together and moving our relationship to a happier, more loving place. I cried several times in the session--suprise, surprise--and when it was over, Hans was very sweet and gentle with me. We've agreed that I will drive to the sessions, and that, for the safety of both of us and the car, he will drive us home after. Overall, it was a hugely positive experience and it reinforced my feeling that a few small changes in the way we interact may have an enormous, positive impact on the relationship.

The biggest thing I have to face is that if we are going to succeed as a couple, I have to be willing to take the relationship to the next level, too. That will take work and dedication on my part and will be a test of my ability to walk my talk. I have to be willing to be mature and make the hard choices, which I say I'm willing to do, but I won't know for sure until I actually arrive at that juncture. Finding out what you're made of is more than a little scary.

The Monster's In the Mail
Mood:  celebratory
Topic: Writing
I can't believe it, but somehow I did make it through a complete line edit of the manuscript in time to meet the December 1 postmark deadline. I ended up pulling an all-nighter on Wednesday to make it--and I'm still trying to recover from that--but mostly I am just really, really happy. The new draft has to be better than what I started with, although I have something of a Picasso Cubist view of the manuscript right now. Some pieces stand out and jut up in my brain against each other in weird combinations. I didn't have an opportunity to read the whole manuscript again once I'd made the changes, so I really have no idea what I submitted. This is especially true of the acknowledgments page! I hadn't written this page before, thinking that would come last, once I had an actual publisher and knew the manuscript was going to materialize as a book. So the acknowledgments were written while I was trying to get dressed and out the door for work on Thursday morning, and I don't know what I said, only that it took me a page and a half to say it and I hope that's okay because the guidelines called for an "acknowledgments page." I know at one point I was using ________s to hold places for people's last names that I couldn't remember and needed to look up, and all I can hope is that I removed or filled in all of those blanks before I submitted it! I ended up having to take June from Maine off entirely because I couldn't find her name on the list of riders I had, and I listed the three main people at the American Lung Association of Washington by their first names only because Paul's was the only last name I could remember and Carolyn and Kathryn no longer work there, so I couldn't find them on the online directory.

It was amazing immersing myself in the manuscript again. There were things I couldn't believe I did--or didn't do--for instance, why didn't I just ask Richard if he knew anything about why Cynthia was missing from the Ride? Why did I feel the need to stay that far away from him? And I suddenly had insights into the feelings and actions of other riders that I hadn't had at the time or while writing the book the first time around. In places, I really seem to have regressed to an earlier time in my life, almost like high school. The only defense I have for some of my decisions is that the Ride brought emotions to the surface and made them more accessible, more immediate, much more intense than usual--much like being a teenager. I was swimming in hormones and endorphins and living in a world I was making up moment to moment.

The reimmersion also made me miss so many people. I would really like to see Janine, the Crisis Manager from Pallotta. She helped me when I was in the emergency room at the hospital in Idaho, and she helped me when Cynthia was missing, and I would really like to thank her again. There are a lot of people I would like to thank, and people I'd like to ride with. Maybe someday....

The other interesting thing is that between the line edits and the conversion from Microsoft Word (from my old Apple) to RTF (thanks to John) to Appleworks (because my new Apple with OS X doesn't have Word because I'm too cheap to buy it again), the manuscript went from 427 pages to 332, which sounds much less daunting, and much less like the sprawling work of a novice writer who can't manage her material!

Who Needs Positive Self-Esteem?
Mood:  rushed
Topic: Writing
Reading the manuscript that took three years to write three years ago has been an emotional roller coaster. A lot of the language feels forced and I use too many words, and I, the narrator, come off really bad--whiney, wimpy, naive, lazy, mean (really mean!). I wanted the manuscript to be honest, and I don't care how that makes me look, except if I'm too awful, no one's going to want to keep reading (provided anyone actually wants to start). So I not only get to berate myself for my poor writing, I also get to berate myself for all the bad choices and the bad character I displayed on the Ride itself. Woo hoo, a two-fer!

At first, I thought the whole thing sucked--like, as in the worst thing written, ever. (Hans, much to my surprise, insists it's not THAT bad.) But somewhere around page 100, I start to get the hang of the whole long distance cycling thing and things start to get interesting. (But, then, all the really interesting things were cut in the second draft to preserve other riders' privacy.) Then somewhere around page 300 it starts to get annoying. I get really annoying.

I was kidding myself when I said I would read the copy I have already printed from three years ago and then mail it off without changes. It needs a line by line edit, but it also needs a major overhaul.

With any luck, it will get the line by line edit--I'm taking half a day off from work tomorrow and have been operating on only about four hours sleep per night--in time for me to meet the December 1 postmark deadline. The overhaul will have to come after I submit it. (I'm not sure exactly why I'm submitting it, except that I said I was going to and having said that is giving me motivation to dig into the manuscript. Some small part of me is hoping for some kind of feedback as a result of submitting, but I know that is absolutely not going to happen. I'll be lucky if the first ten pages get read before all 427 pages meet the recycling bin.)

The one good thing is that, even though I still know the darn thing almost by heart--to the point that I know what has already been cut, and when I'm reading I automatically insert those things before realizing they're gone and remembering why they're gone--I do have some perspective. What I realized today is that with all of the drafts I have done, none of them really attacked the structure of the whole manuscript. I was so worried about recreating my experience accurately that I was scared to delete, rearrange, amplify. I knew that what I wrote would be how I ultimately would remember things, and I wanted to remember them honestly. What I have written is a very accurate account of the events of my life over the course of 48 days in the summer of 1998. That doesn't make it a memoir, just a really, really, long journal. There are some luminous moments, when I seem to just be starting to get at the poetry of it, but they don't happen often enough.

Once the line edit is done, I need to really shape the material. I have a structure in mind for that, one that builds on what's there already, but I will need to largely rewrite the last third of the book to really do the experience justice. To get to its meaning. To make other people understand why I'm still hung up on this thing that I didn't even do that well seven years ago. I need to find a good teacher who will work with me, or a good editor, but who can afford that?

Catch ya' on Thursday when the monster's in the mail....

Assessing the Amount of Suckage
Mood:  mischievious
Topic: Writing
I have found a competition here in North Carolina to which I want to submit YMMV. Unlike a lot of competitions that cap the length of the manuscript at 300 pages, this one accepts manuscripts up to 500 pages, which is good for someone who managed to go on and on about herself for 427 pages. (And that's 427 edited pages - it used to be even longer before Hans go t his hands on it.) The deadline for submissions is December 1, so I have to get moving. I have a copy of it that I printed out before I came to North Carolina to "visit" almost four years ago now and I need to reread that this week before I print out a fresh copy and mail it off. The read-through is basically to reacquaint myself with the manuscript, and, hopefully, to reassure myself it's good, because there really isn't time to make any substantive changes. On Thursday night, however, I read the first page and the last page, and I'm pretty sure they both suck. Which probably means the 425 pages in between also suck. The language feels naive and embarrassing. Sometimes I will write something and read it years later and think, "Wow! I can't believe I wrote that. I was so smart then!" This does not feel like that. It is still incredibly fresh in my mind--like I wrote it just last week--and there is none of that distance that lets me just enjoy it as though it were someone else's story. It is painfully mine. There is a good chance I clear my throat twice before actually beginning the story. And I can't get Hans's voice out of my head from 2001 telling me how "whiney" I, as the narrator, am.

But, to counter, there is the voice of the one New York agent who actually took the time to call me to request the full manuscript who said it sounded like a "fresh" story and that I should publishing excerpts in women's magazines. And there's Kate who said she thought it should be required reading for every high school girl. There's Zoi who said she got so sucked along in the story and caught up in being back on the Big Ride that she read it one day (it takes me three days to read it and I wrote the damn thing!). And there's the voice in my head telling me just to get the thing back out into the world.

So I'll let you know in three days what the experience of rereading my first booklength manuscript four years after the fact feels like.

Invoking the 5-Minute Rule
Mood:  energetic
Topic: Body Awareness
I've been experimenting this month with exercise, trying to decide what feels good, what I want to do, what I will enjoy doing - at least for a little while. I started lifting upper body free weights two weeks ago, then this week converted that into a circuit training/fat burning routine by adding in intervals of step aerobics between muscle groups. Believe it or not, it's a fun workout and one that will challenge me longer than the Curves routine I looked into. Plus, it will grow with me because I can increase the weights, add more minutes of steps, and add in jumps and more dance moves. And I had decided that I wanted to go back to my Sunday morning running. I stopped eight weeks ago, and even though I wasn't doing all the workouts in my training schedule for the marathon, what I was doing was keeping my stomach flatter and my legs muscular. Eight weeks of doing nothing has brought back the sausage link look around my middle, and I don't like the way that feels. So this morning I went out for a three mile workout that started as a run/walk but I noticed that on the run portions I was leaving my left leg too early trying to protect my knee that didn't feel strong enough. For the last two miles I ended up just doing a fast walk carrying hand weights, and finishing with a ten minute cool down. The hand weights may not do that much for my arms (although I think they might make a slight difference in the workout my upper back gets), but they allow me to focus on pushing my hands away from my body, which keeps my feet moving faster than they normally would and helps me keep a regular rhythm.

It is a gorgeous morning and I enjoyed the workout. So I'm invoking the 5-minute rule every day from now on. I have a mental schedule of workouts that include the weight/step routine, yoga, and walking and I know that, once I get moving, I enjoy each of those workouts. The hard part is getting myself moving. So from now on, I have to get out of bed and do five minutes of that day's workout. If, after 5 minutes, I really want to stop, I can. I used to use this to get myself to the pool at 5:00 a.m. in Seattle. I would argue with myself getting out of bed, getting dressed, the whole time I was walking to the pool, and sometimes even after I was changing into my swimsuit in the locker room, but after going through all of that, I only left once after 5 minutes of warming up. The rest of the time I finished the workout.

Buzzing
Mood:  caffeinated
Topic: Daily Eruptions
I should be sleeping, but I couldn't stop buzzing long enough to really even close my eyes, so I'm out of bed again. I talked to Mike for the first time in more than a decade tonight and I'm feeling jazzed-yet-peaceful all at the same time. It feels like some little piece of the world shifted back into its rightful place, and I am a happy girl. It was a bizarre conversation--fourteen years apart has certainly changed our topics of conversation (jobs, spouses, houses, kids) and our vocabularies--but it felt relaxed and like we were connecting well. He's centered and mature and easy to talk to. Afterward, of course, there is that little voice in my head that wonders if he thought I was a total loser but was too nice to let on, to which I hear Scott answering that that's just my low self-esteem talking and Tad saying that I am one of his favorite people in the world, and I realize that I have a ton of questions about what Mike thinks and believes and builds his world on that we never even got to. Next time....

I was thinking earlier today about the strange place I'm in in my life. On some level, I feel like I'm returning to an earlier time and trying to recapture who I was or who I was on the way to becoming (yes, I know, I'm repeating myself here). This feels like an unburying. Like I'm physically unburying my body from the layers of fat I piled on it in order to hide my true self, and like I'm emotionally excavating to try to unearth the things that are truly "me" and not just things I took on (that other people told me were mine or that I wanted to be mine) that aren't organic to my life at all.

On another level, I feel like maybe I'm not going backward but just beginning to emerge from some kind of cocoon that I've been in for years. I think my therapist would prefer this way of looking at it because she was trying to encourage me to see my life as a continual process and not as the series of starts and stops I first presented it to her as.

But what I think it might really be is a punctuation period in my life's equilibrium, a sudden transformative burst of evolution disrupting a long period of little change. I'm not in control of it and I have only a slight sense of where it's going. All I know is that it is necessary and good and inescapable, so I just have to ride out the wave and see where I end up. So I'm a butterfly-mutant-surfer.... I really have to talk to Tad soon!

I'm working on an overarching intention to help me live my life according to priorities rather than goals or to-do lists. I'm thinking something along the lines of "Every choice I make today will support my ability to live my fullest life." I need to check on my verb there to make sure it's in the correct tense for an intention (an affirmation says something already is, an intention I think then says something will be?) and something still feels funky about "my ability to".... It's not ability I'm talking about here. I have tons of that! That's potential energy, and I want to be talking about kinetic energy. So maybe "Every choice I make today will enable me to stay awake, connected, and true." Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Buzzed out...off to sleep for real this time.

Grateful, happy, hopeful!

Notes I've Been Too Busy to Post
Mood:  happy
Topic: Daily Eruptions
I feel like I've been gone from this space for ages!! I've been blogging non-stop in my head for days, but haven't been here to actually type up the posts. I don't know how many of the mental notes I'll get through now because I'm on my lunch break and I'm only going to spend 30 minutes here, but here goes:

Continuing on the feeling loved & circling back theme - I finally checked back in on the Classmates.com site on Saturday (you can't check there very often because it is all too easy to feel like the unpopular kid all over again) and was pleased and amazed to find a message from Mike! It had been sent the same day that James sent me his first email, and it sounded like he was truly glad to have found me again.

Mike and I haven't spoken since the day in June of 2001 when I told him I was taking the job at U. S. PIRG. He had called me a few weeks earlier, drunk I think, to tell me he'd received his first posting following his graduation from the academy, and to ask me if I would go with him. First of all, he was assigned to a ship in Hawaii - what girl doesn't drop everything to follow a cute guy to Hawaii (especially a cute guy who has given her butterflies in her stomach every time he's touched her since she was twelve years old)? Second, in his phone invitation he used the most amazing line and delivered it so sincerely, I am absolutely amazed even today that I didn't go with him. (No, I won't tell you what he said, just that it would make any girl's knees go weak. There has been a play bouncing around in my head ever since the night Marc broke up with me in Houston (now there's a good story), and when I finally write it, the line will be there. Don't worry, you won't miss it. Any sooner than that and some other writer will recognize the beauty of those eight little words arranged in exactly that order and steal the line away from me ;) ) Apparently I felt the call to save the world very strongly that summer! Anyway, our last meeting didn't go well and Mike felt that I, working for what was, in part, a government watchdog organization, was a threat to his chances of getting security clearances for his government job. Sound of door slamming shut. Immediate end to a friendship and flirtation that had started in seventh grade and survived ten years.

But, here he is now, married with kids, sorry for the way things ended, and wanting to know if we can get to know each other again all of these years later. Cool!!

I've been thinking more about who I still might need to reconnect with, and if I'm being honest, I need to reconnect with Ron from the Big Ride - maybe for legal reasons if I publish the manuscript since he plays such a large part, and definitely for my own peace of mind. The last time we talked he had called to ask if I was going to a writer's conference in Seattle and I had had to admit that I wasn't going because Hans and I were having our wedding that weekend in the San Juans. He was upset - because I hadn't told him sooner? because I couldn't invite him? because it broke me loose one more time from whatever box he'd try to put me in? -and ended the conversation quickly. When I tried to find him the following fall, he had changed jobs and moved and I have no idea where he's gone. He's got one of those names that a million other men have, and as far as I can tell, has not left a distinguishable Internet footprint yet. I asked Randy to let him know I wanted to get in touch, but I heard nothing back, which means either Randy forgot, Randy has lost track of him, too, or Ron doesn't want me to find him. In that last call he said he felt like the Big Ride hadn't happened because he didn't have me around to reminisce with. I'm feeling that, too, and would like to rebuild that bridge.

Also, on a less painful, more wistful note, I'm missing Owen. He met me in the middle of my post-Big Ride depression and, somehow, still managed to see through to me. He was definitely a fellow adventurer! We exchanged writing for awhile after I left the Beach Rangers and he worked very hard to convince me that I am an Artist and need to live in a way that respects that. I regret that I haven't read more of his work because he's got amazing stories about Africa and Alaska that I hope he's still writing down. Thankfully, we did not have one of those awful, conclusive ends to our friendship. He simply got married and started getting busy with children about the time I moved unexpectedly to North Carolina. We're friends-who-exchange-holiday-cards at this point, but I will need to call him and demand to be brought up to date on his life. Soon.

Okay. Long post. Still much more to say. Later....

Loved
Mood:  special
Topic: Daily Eruptions
I'm feeling particularly blissed out tonight. I received a very sweet email from James yesterday, to which I still owe a reply, followed by a phone conversation with Scott (which was really a continuation of a conversation we had started the night before) followed soon after by a phone call from Chad. The universe showered me with love and I'm still feeling the glow! Sudie had a party last Sunday in part to prove to herself that she has a large contingent of friends. I can't do that--at least not without several months of advance planning so travel arrangements can be made or without the aid of satellite video feeds from multiple locations--but, then, I've always been better in a more intimate setting and I really enjoy the little moments of connection I get with the people who really get me. I have to check in with Tad pretty soon, though. I promised him a handwritten letter, which I started when I was in Orlando but haven't gotten back to, and now it's just getting to the point where I need to call him and have an actual conversation.

One of the main themes in my conversations with both Scott and Chad was marriage. I have been wondering lately if anyone has done a survey research paper on what characteristics, aside from age of maturation of offspring, various species who pair-bond for life have in common. What determines whether a species is monogamous for life or for a season? I think I'm looking for an animal model on which to build some justification for marriage in humans in the 21st Century. (Chad thinks I'm looking for a scientific answer to an emotional question, and laughed openly at me when I suggested this information might be useful.) Some part of me has come to the conclusion that the only good reason to get and stay married is to have children. (And that doesn't seem to be in the cards for this marriage and my biological clock is ticking so damn loudly these days....) But, when I come to that conclusion, I hear Tad (probably fed in part by Richard Bach and Robert Heinlein and certainly Rilke) reminding me that love is the real work of this life and that marriage and the commitment you make to a single individual enable you to best do that work. This is followed fairly quickly by a whining voice from me saying, "yeah, but I do serial monogamy pretty well--can't I just go back to my schedule of three-year relationships and get most of the work done, anyway?" Perhaps unfortunately, Scott has also come to the conclusion that marriage is pretty much for people who want to have kids.

Then there's Chad who is moving very quickly toward engagement and marriage. He calls me for reassurance that he's doing the right thing, which I mostly think he is. He has been my closest friend for sixteen years now and we've helped each other over some major hurdles and been each other's number one cheerleader through good times and bad. I am so proud of how far he's come in every area of his life, and I really want him to be happy. But in the marriage area, I'm handicapped two ways: one, there is a selfish little part of me that wants him to be in love with me forever and never quite find a woman who matches up to the high standards I set (it appears, however, that he has found a woman who surpasses me in every way and who loves him completely), and two, it's difficult to encourage marriage when you're questioning the health and rationale of your own. I feel more like the best man the night before the wedding trying to talk the groom out of making the biggest mistake of his life than like the romantic, idealistic woman I have been most of my life. I don't like feeling this way. I have no indication how long the feeling will last, however, and am just trying to make peace with it. [And for anyone who might be worried that I am warning Chad away from his soul mate and the one true love of his life, I assure you that I am not warning Chad away at all. I have been honest about my own situation, which is what Chad expects, but nothing but encouraging and supportive about the path his relationship is taking. I only feel like the jaded best man, I'm not acting like him.]

And in the meantime, Hans and I are still on pretty good footing although there was talk this week about changes to his job that might not bode well for his being able to remain present in our relationship as we head toward the end of the year and into the next. When we were in grad school, I knew that he wasn't really with me even when he was a foot away if he was working on a screenplay or a story, because he was always writing even when he wasn't physically writing. I wish I had understood that this absence would carry over to any large project he was engaged in. He understands that I feel he just came back to me after being absent for the last four months and has said he's going to work on sticking around even with the changes coming up, so I'm hoping for the best. Scott says that if we've managed to climb up out of the rut, even for the past two weeks, that is reason to hope we won't fall back in when things get tough in the future. Let's hope he's right.

Happy Halloween!
Mood:  happy
Topic: Mindfulness
I feel great today!

Hans and I rounded out our lazy weekend, which wasn't really all that lazy because I did more housework than I've done since I returned from vacation, by watching Birth, a very stylized film starring Nicole Kidman as a woman whose husband dies and who meets a little boy ten years later who is convinced he is the reincarnation of her dead husband. I loved it. Rent it or catch it on cable.

And the change back to standard time made it easier to get out of bed this morning. We have cloudless blue skies and a brilliant sun today that is giving me tons of energy, and, somehow, tons of hope! I'm actually looking forward to the fall and winter, which is a rarity for me, because I feel like the turning inward that will accompany the darker, colder weather will have a positive impact on my life. I'm feeling excitement to write, to submit to journals and magazines, to get the house decorated, to immerse myself in regular workouts and a writing and reading schedule.

I read an article last night in the November issue of O, The Oprah Magazine, titled "Are Your Goals Holding You Back?" and with the teaser on the cover reading, "What the Happiest People Know for Sure." It talked about exactly the realization that I came to in therapy last month, but the article didn't use any of the psychological terms for it. Basically, it discussed a new book, Goal-Free Living, by Stephen Shapiro that will be released next month. Shapiro believes that making SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Results-oriented, Time based)--the kind that you are taught to make in time management and personal change classes everywhere--keep you from seeing opportunities at the periphery that might be exciting and fulfilling if you were willing to change directions and pursue them. He also argues that most people's goals aren't really their own, anyway, but come from societal or family expectations and pressures.

When I arrived in college I figured out pretty quickly that the goals I had for my future weren't necessarily my own, and I've been trying to define what my own goals are ever since. I have been pretty good at seeing the opportunities at the periphery, and taking them--my resume is a testament to this--and following what Shapiro describes as a circuitous path. But, I haven't been able to fully rid myself of the need to make SMART "goals," either. I feel compelled to make them, but as soon as they are made, I begin sabotaging my efforts to achieve them.

So this is the big discovery I made last month: I choose to do something for good, personal reasons, meaning I have high intrinsic motivations. This is desirable. Once I have chosen, however, I somehow move the action outside of myself where it can be viewed, judged, and rewarded or punished by others. At this point, all of my motivation to continue has become extrinsic, coming from external factors. What I think and feel about it is suddenly not important. This is undesirable. As my therapist reminded me, most people choose to do something due to extrinsic motivation, then continue doing it because they find intrinsic motivations they hadn't seen before. For example, your doctor tells you you have to start walking to get some weight off. You do it because you are afraid of the consequences if you don't. Along the way, you realize that you enjoy being outdoors, that you enjoy the time to think or to socialize with your walking partner, that you enjoy feeling fit, that you enjoy being thinner. So, by then, usually around week 6 or 8, you are carried along in your walking routine by habit and by pleasure and motivations of your own. I do it backwards. I know how I learned this and it goes way back to elementary school. I can't believe it took me this long to figure it out.

So, the plan now, and for the next six months, is to make no SMART goals. I am allowed to make intentions that I use each day, but no goals. (This is hard because even in my writing class that finished last week the facilitator asked us to make goals and to figure out how to meet those goals by breaking the required actions down into smaller daily, weekly, and monthly goals. I didn't feel comfortable writing intentions, and instead fell into making specific, measurable, time-oriented goals that were extremely lofty.) For example, the intention my therapist suggested I use for writing is "I will spend quiet time with my thoughts each day and if I feel the desire to write, I will follow that desire." At the same time, I am to engage in physical activity three times a week because I am making that commitment to take care of myself, and not because I expect it to help me lose weight or change the shape of my body. So I guess what I'm really trying to avoid is measuring behavior in any kind of results oriented way, and instead, to engage in activities for the pure joy they bring. This is very difficult to learn. The irony is that, at least from other sources such as Kabat-Zinn and Shapiro, immersing yourself in the present and experiencing the excitement and passion in each moment without worrying about the future is the best way to achieve the results and the change you desire. Like I said, very difficult for this over-achiever-turned-massive-underachiever to grasp. But I'm trying.

R & R
Topic: Movies
Hans and I have been spoiling ourselves a little this weekend. He finished "season" at his job on Friday because Halloween is his company's primary focus, and I'm taking a three day weekend with Monday off to spend time with Candy's kids on Halloween. (I'm even going to dress up!) So things were more relaxed around here, which has been really nice.

We went to see Everything is Illuminated last night and I was blown away. All I knew about it going in was that it was Liev Schreiber's directorial debut and that he had edited the movie while doing six shows a week on broadway, and that Elijah Wood was the star. It was truly one of a kind. Powerful on a level that makes me want to own it on DVD, which is saying a lot because Hans and I own only about a dozen films and each one is storytelling of a quality we aspire to achieve one day. I really need to see the movie again. Then, I need to read the book. Then, I need to get as much back story as I can on the book and the making of the movie.

This afternoon we went to see In Her Shoes, which was also good, but a completely different kind of movie. Some of the reviews have said that it is a movie for everyone, but I have to say I think it is mostly a chick flick. Hans enjoyed it, but I still think the audience is primarily female. (Hans was the only man in the audience today with me and four other women, and the women talked through the whole movie.... Is this a Burlington/Greensboro thing, or are audiences truly getting ruder as Hans and I have suspected for quite awhile?) I enjoyed watching how this screenplay captured or condensed various aspects of the novel. Sometimes on-screen dialogue said what the narrator in the book had thought, a whole section of the book was rewritten into an encounter with a retired professor who did not appear in the book at all, and some things that seemed important in the novel show up only as small asides that you may or may not notice in the movie. The screenplay expertly captured the feeling and intent of the novel and streamlined it into a story that flowed along so nicely I wondered briefly if Jennifer Weiner, the author, had learned anything from the screenwriter that would affect the cinematic quality of her future novels. But thinking back on the novel now, it was quite visual and none of the pieces felt extraneous or self-indulgent when I was reading it. It held my interest from start to finish, and, as some of you may remember, kept me glued to the couch several nights in a row reading when I should have been unpacking. So I'm hoping that Jennifer's style doesn't change, and I will just say that both the novel and the screenplay used techniques to expertly tell a genuinely good story.

Happy Halloween, everyone!