Mood: rushed
Topic: Daily Eruptions
Sudie left her latest Yoga Journal on my desk today, so I read an article about enlightenment while I ate lunch. Nothing really earth shaking in it, mostly just good reminders about things I've read, heard, or thought previously. The author recommends a series of exercises to help you "practice" enlightenment, which she defines as an understanding that every object and every life is one with your own consciousness. The fourth exercise in the series asks you to hold an enemy in your thoughts and attempt to experience that person as part of your own consciousness, to feel compassion and love flowing between you. Over the years, I have practiced this while thinking of various ex-boyfriends and Ned, my first boss in Seattle, who I have decided came into my life to teach me once and for all to stand up for my self-worth and individuality in the face of blatant discrimination and verbal abuse and to make my own creative life, rather than churning out boring trade copy for a monthly magazine just to say I was a writer and editor. But even though each of these men hurt me deeply in his own, brutally unique way, I do not believe in the concept of "enemy." [Some of my most valuable lessons have come from these experiences, so how can I consider my teachers enemies? These men may not have had love in their hearts for me (though I think some of them did, even as they were forcing me out of their lives), but I am free to feel gratitude and compassion for them.] I can't think of one person with whom I haven't been able to find some common ground (post high school, of course, because high school, for all of its pressures toward conformity, is the antithesis of common ground), and that's one of the things I really like about me. It made me good at talking to people about environmental issues when I was working for PIRG, and it makes meeting strangers easier for me every day.
When I think about the word "enemy" now, the closest I can come to actually pinning that title on an individual is to find someone who I feel is an enemy of the ideals or ethical standards in which I believe. Therefore, Shrub is the easiest target. He seems so completely removed from reality, and yet he believes his policies and his views are based on strong ethical ground, too. Still, I get physically ill at the sound of his voice. There was a point during the last election, though, during the last debate, when I actually felt I could trust him and I was proud of his performance. Afterall, he stood up straight and smiled and seemed rational. This is the closest I have come in terms of enlightenment when it comes to him. Of course, when I told Hans about these feelings, he was angry--how could I be proud of a man who, after three+ years in office, was just now learning that he had to talk to the people of the country as though their opinions mattered and who had finally accepted the coaching he had received so that he could fake looking presidential?
Apparently, the PIRG brainwashing I underwent at the age of 21 was very powerful, because, even fifteen years later, there is a part of me that is resistant to letting go of my resistance to this man. It is still easier to break things down into the "your either part of the problem or part of the solution" mentality of 1990's environmentalism than it is to consider him as a man who believes in himself and his convictions. I suppose it comes down to a separation between feeling compassion for the man as a human being--of this, I think I am capable--and believing the man should be leading our country. So in all my spare time, you'll find me practicing remembering that Shrub is part of my own consciousness.
Afterall, Ford's in his Flivver, and all's well with the world.
Thoughts captured by Kristine
at 12:01 AM EDT
Updated: Friday, July 1, 2005 12:33 AM EDT